Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs FFLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to FFLC's +11.0%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and FFLC
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $1.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF.
Pair scorecard
FFLC costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; CGGR is far larger, $26.1bn against $1.2bn.
| Measure | CGGR | FFLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +11.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.38% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.1bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 39.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FFLC hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and FFLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and FFLC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and FFLC +11.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.4 points.
- Size. CGGR has $26.1bn in net assets and FFLC $1.2bn (net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026); CGGR is 21.8 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FFLC is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 83% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 115 positions, with the top ten at 39.5%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FFLC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and FFLC +11.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or FFLC?
- FFLC is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against FFLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-fflc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against FFLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-fflc
[CGGR against FFLC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-fflc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.