CGGE vs FWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGGE and FWD hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and FWD returned +26.9% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $3.3bn for Capital Group Global Equity ETF and $3.5bn for AB Disruptors ETF.
CGGE costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points.
| CGGE | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $3.3bn | $3.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.3% | +26.9% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.9% | 19.3% |
| Below its high | 10.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGE and FWD hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
16% in common
On the same fields
CGGE and FWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGE in plain words
CGGE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 51% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 115 positions, with the top ten at 33.9%.
FWD in plain words
FWD is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 52% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 115 positions, with the top ten at 19.3%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGE or FWD?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGE returned +13.3% and FWD +26.9%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGE or FWD?
- CGGE is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGE against FWD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-fwd
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGGE against FWD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-fwd
[CGGE against FWD (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgge-vs-fwd)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.