Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to VGT's +24.7%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and VGT

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points; VGT is 4.0 times larger.

CGDV vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$38.4bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +107.2% +151.9%
Annualized edge VGT +16.9% +22.0%
Price return edge VGT +93.0% +144.4%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV 14.8% 24.7%
Max drawdown edge CGDV −21.1% −27.3%
Downside capture 88.1% 99.9%
Beta 0.93 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.76
Sortino edge CGDV (slight) 1.28 1.18
Treynor 0.134 0.201
Calmar edge Tie 0.80 0.81
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.80
Information ratio 0.68 0.19
Tracking error 5.6% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +151.9% to +107.2%. CGDV swung less: 14.8% to 24.7%. CGDV fell less at its worst: −21.1% to −27.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+151.9%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+22.0%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+144.4%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%24.7%CGDVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%15.9%CGDVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−27.3%CGDVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.861.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.76CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.281.18CGDV (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.81TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.680.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and VGT hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV VGT
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 11.16%
NVIDIA Corp 6.32% 17.58%
Broadcom Inc 4.67% 4.11%
Apple Inc 2.21% 15.91%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.60% 1.60%
Applied Materials Inc 1.85% 1.53%
Intel Corp 1.11% 1.98%
Oracle Corp 3.22% 0.85%
Micron Technology Inc 0.80% 4.45%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.13% 0.79%
Salesforce Inc 1.21% 0.72%
Corning Inc 0.68% 0.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
RTX Corp 3.16%
General Electric Co 3.05%
Comcast Corp 2.61%
Starbucks Corp 2.44%
Carrier Global Corp 2.36%
Only in VGT
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Lam Research Corp 1.55%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.55%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.24%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.02%
KLA Corp 0.98%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.98%
Sandisk Corp 0.97%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 86.8%
Holdings 53 320
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $39.1bn $154.5bn

CGDV and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1D0FB2BC8F

CGDV and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.