Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to XLK's +27.1%; 31% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and XLK
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLK costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; XLK is 3.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Technology Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $125.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLK hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
31% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and XLK do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 31% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLK
XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and XLK +27.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xlk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against XLK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xlk
[CGDV against XLK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xlk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.