Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs XLK: how they differ

CGDV and XLK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in XLK
Microsoft Corp 5.81%NVIDIA CORP 14.31%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%APPLE INC 12.98%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%MICROSOFT CORP 9.90%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%BROADCOM INC 4.62%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.23%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.11%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%INTEL CORP 3.27%
General Electric Co 3.08%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

CGDV and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapital GroupState Street
What it isDividend ValueTechnology
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%100.0%
Holdings5374

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLK?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLK?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources