Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs IWF: how they differ
CGDV and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | NVIDIA 15.46% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | APPLE 7.77% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | MICROSOFT 5.55% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | BROADCOM INC 5.10% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital Group | iShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 53 | 315 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and IWF returned +7.0%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or IWF?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources