Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to QQQM's +15.2%; 35% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and QQQM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; QQQM is 2.8 times larger.

CGDV vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$39.1bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common35%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM (slight) +107.2% +115.5%
Annualized edge QQQM (slight) +16.9% +17.9%
Price return edge QQQM +93.0% +109.0%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV 14.8% 21.5%
Max drawdown edge CGDV −21.1% −27.6%
Downside capture 88.1% 99.8%
Beta 0.93 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.68
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 1.05
Treynor 0.134 0.147
Calmar edge CGDV 0.80 0.65
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.62
Information ratio 0.68 0.10
Tracking error 5.6% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned slightly more: +115.5% to +107.2%. CGDV swung less: 14.8% to 21.5%. CGDV fell less at its worst: −21.1% to −27.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+115.5%QQQM (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+17.9%QQQM (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+109.0%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%21.5%CGDVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%13.9%CGDVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−27.6%CGDVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.861.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.68CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.281.05CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.65CGDVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.680.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

35%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and QQQM hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

35% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV QQQM
NVIDIA Corp 6.32% 8.17%
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 6.14%
Alphabet Inc 3.55% 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27% 2.87%
Broadcom Inc 4.67% 2.53%
Apple Inc 2.21% 7.88%
Amazon.com Inc 2.00% 4.25%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.60% 1.89%
Applied Materials Inc 1.85% 1.35%
Intel Corp 1.11% 2.12%
Linde PLC 1.92% 1.01%
Amgen Inc 0.98% 1.04%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
RTX Corp 3.16%
General Electric Co 3.05%
Carrier Global Corp 2.36%
Union Pacific Corp 2.35%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.19%
Only in QQQM
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.96%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.89%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.41%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 95.7%
Holdings 53 105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $39.1bn $110.4bn

CGDV and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-07EC9F7A66

CGDV and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 35% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. Cost. CGDV charges 0.33% of assets a year and QQQM 0.15%, a gap of 0.18 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.