Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGCV vs CGGR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGCV returned +10.9% to CGGR's +2.6%; 31% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGCV and CGGR
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.2bn for Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF and $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGCV costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; CGGR is 11.8 times larger.
| Measure | CGCV | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.9% | +2.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $2.2bn | $25.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32.2% | 39.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGCV and CGGR hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
31% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGCV and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGCV and CGGR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 31% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGCV returned +10.9% and CGGR +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.3 points.
- Size. CGCV has $2.2bn in net assets and CGGR $25.9bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); CGGR is 11.8 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGCV
CGCV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 73 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCV or CGGR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCV returned +10.9% and CGGR +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCV or CGGR?
- CGCV is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCV against CGGR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-cggr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGCV against CGGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-cggr
[CGCV against CGGR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcv-vs-cggr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.