Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs FLQL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to FLQL's +13.7%; 33% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and FLQL
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLQL costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.1 points; CGGR is 12.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | FLQL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +13.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | U.S. Large Cap Underlying Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $25.6bn | $2.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 33% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 36.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FLQL hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
33% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and FLQL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and FLQL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and FLQL follows U.S. Large Cap Underlying Index.
- Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and FLQL +13.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
FLQL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 215 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FLQL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and FLQL +13.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or FLQL?
- FLQL is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against FLQL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-flql
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against FLQL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-flql
[CGGR against FLQL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-flql)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.