Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGCP vs VPLS: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 CGCP's duration was 6.1 years and VPLS's 5.4; VPLS charges 0.20% to CGCP's 0.34%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGCP and VPLS
Net assets: $8.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF, and $2.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
VPLS costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; CGCP is 4.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGCP | VPLS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | −1.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $8.3bn | $2.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 15, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 149 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: CGCP against AGG, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; VPLS against IUSB, Dec 15, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026.
VPLS returned more: +10.7% to +9.5%. CGCP and VPLS swung about the same: 4.6% and 4.7%. VPLS fell slightly less at its worst: −4.1% to −4.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGCP | VPLS | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +9.5% | +10.7% | VPLS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.2% | +3.6% | VPLS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −5.2% | −2.6% | VPLS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 4.6% | 4.7% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 3.4% | 3.5% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −4.4% | −4.1% | VPLS (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 96.0% | 102.5% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 94.0% | 99.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.96 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.99 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.24 | −0.16 | VPLS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.33 | −0.21 | VPLS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | −0.032 | −0.007 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.73 | 0.88 | VPLS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | AGG | IUSB | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.5% a year | +0.5% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.59 | 1.40 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −1.1% to +2.0% | −0.2% to +1.1% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.36 | 0.80 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.7% | 0.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 149 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGCP and VPLS hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
6% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGCP and VPLS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGCP and VPLS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 6% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
- Cost. CGCP charges 0.34% of assets a year and VPLS 0.20%, a gap of 0.14 points.
- Size. CGCP has $8.3bn in net assets and VPLS $2.0bn (net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026); CGCP is 4.2 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGCP
CGCP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year.
VPLS
VPLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCP or VPLS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCP returned −1.4% and VPLS −1.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCP or VPLS?
- VPLS is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCP against VPLS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-vpls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGCP against VPLS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-vpls
[CGCP against VPLS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-vpls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.