Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EVTR vs VPLS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

On Jun 30, 2026 EVTR's duration was 5.3 years and VPLS's 5.4; VPLS charges 0.20% to EVTR's 0.32%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EVTR and VPLS

Net assets: $5.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF, and $2.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF.

At a glance
−1.1%
EVTR total return, 1 year
−1.0%
VPLS total return, 1 year
0.32%
EVTR expense ratio
0.20%
VPLS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPLS costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.

EVTR vs VPLS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEVTRVPLS
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.1%−1.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.32%0.20%
Net assets, EVTR as of Jun 30, 2026 and VPLS as of Sep 30, 2026$5.6bn$2.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 5, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 133 weekly returns · each against IUSB
EVTR VPLS
Return
Total return edge EVTR (slight) +11.9% +11.0%
Annualized edge EVTR (slight) +4.5% +4.2%
Price return edge EVTR −0.7% −1.1%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 4.5% 4.6%
Max drawdown edge VPLS −4.7% −4.1%
Downside capture 98.8% 99.6%
Beta 1.00 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EVTR 0.04 −0.02
Sortino edge EVTR 0.06 −0.03
Treynor 0.002 −0.001
Calmar edge VPLS (slight) 0.96 1.01
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.6% a year +0.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.21 0.87
Information ratio 0.76 0.53
Tracking error 0.8% 0.5%
Reading

EVTR returned slightly more: +11.9% to +11.0%. EVTR and VPLS swung about the same: 4.5% and 4.6%. VPLS fell less at its worst: −4.1% to −4.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EVTR vs VPLS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEVTRVPLSIUSBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+11.9%+11.0%EVTR (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.5%+4.2%EVTR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return−0.7%−1.1%EVTRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.5%4.6%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.3%3.3%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−4.7%−4.1%VPLSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture103.4%101.4%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture98.8%99.6%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.011.00TieHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.970.991.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.04−0.02EVTRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.06−0.03EVTRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.002−0.001−0.004EVTRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.961.01VPLS (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIUSBIUSBIUSBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.6% a year+0.3% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.210.87Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +1.5%−0.4% to +0.9%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.760.53EVTRReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.8%0.5%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 133 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, EVTR and VPLS hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EVTR VPLS
UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Jul 25, 2056 10.80% 2.42%
UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Jul 25, 2056 3.61% 0.91%
UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Jul 25, 2056 1.41% 0.50%
UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Jul 25, 2056 3.24% 0.17%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2050 0.14% 0.15%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 15, 2032 0.83% 0.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co., due Apr 23, 2032 0.54% 0.10%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2045 0.08% 0.10%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Aug 15, 2046 0.17% 0.06%
JPMorgan Chase & Co., due Jan 22, 2037 0.15% 0.06%
Boeing Co. (The), due May 1, 2050 0.18% 0.05%
Oracle Corp., due Feb 4, 2046 0.08% 0.05%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EVTR
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 15, 2031 5.98%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 15, 2032 4.56%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2044 3.55%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2043 3.41%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Apr 30, 2030 2.69%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due May 15, 2035 2.28%
U.S. Treasury Notes, due Sep 30, 2029 2.17%
U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Aug 15, 2045 1.33%
Only in VPLS
PMTLT 2026-INV1 A36, due Jan 25, 2057 1.10%
FNR 2026-22 DF, due Apr 25, 2056 0.96%
FNR 2026-33 FA, due Jul 25, 2055 0.68%
NVIDIA CORP, due Jun 15, 2028 0.66%
OBX 2026-INV2 AF, due Apr 25, 2056 0.64%
KFW, due Jul 22, 2031 0.59%
FNR 2026-46 FL, due Jun 25, 2056 0.58%
FINLAND REP OF, due Jun 3, 2036 0.53%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.1% −1.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs IUSB +0.2 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.20%
Holdings 844 2955
Net assets, EVTR as of Jun 30, 2026 and VPLS as of Sep 30, 2026 $5.6bn $2.0bn

EVTR and VPLS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F79CDBC611

EVTR and VPLS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 5% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
  2. Number of holdings. EVTR holds 844 positions and VPLS holds 2955.
  3. Cost. EVTR charges 0.32% of assets a year and VPLS 0.20%, a gap of 0.12 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EVTR

EVTR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year.

VPLS

VPLS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EVTR or VPLS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EVTR returned −1.1% and VPLS −1.0%.
Which is cheaper, EVTR or VPLS?
VPLS is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EVTR against VPLS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/evtr-vs-vpls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.