Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGCP vs EVTR: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 CGCP's duration was 6.1 years and EVTR's 5.3; EVTR charges 0.32% to CGCP's 0.34%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGCP and EVTR
Net assets: $8.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF, and $5.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
EVTR costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.
| Measure | CGCP | EVTR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | −1.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 0.32% |
| Net assets, CGCP as of Oct 27, 2026 and EVTR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $8.6bn | $5.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 5, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 133 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: CGCP against AGG, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; EVTR against IUSB, Apr 5, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026.
EVTR returned more: +11.9% to +9.7%. CGCP and EVTR swung about the same: 4.5% and 4.5%. CGCP fell slightly less at its worst: −4.4% to −4.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGCP | EVTR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +9.7% | +11.9% | EVTR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.7% | +4.5% | EVTR | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −3.4% | −0.7% | EVTR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 4.5% | 4.5% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 3.3% | 3.3% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −4.4% | −4.7% | CGCP (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 96.0% | 103.4% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 94.0% | 98.8% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.96 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.92 | 0.97 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.12 | 0.04 | EVTR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.17 | 0.06 | EVTR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | −0.032 | 0.002 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.84 | 0.96 | EVTR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | AGG | IUSB | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.5% a year | +0.6% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.59 | 1.21 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −1.1% to +2.0% | −0.4% to +1.5% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.36 | 0.76 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.7% | 0.8% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 133 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGCP and EVTR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGCP and EVTR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGCP and EVTR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGCP returned −1.4% and EVTR −1.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGCP
CGCP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year.
EVTR
EVTR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCP or EVTR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCP returned −1.4% and EVTR −1.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCP or EVTR?
- EVTR is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCP against EVTR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-evtr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGCP against EVTR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-evtr
[CGCP against EVTR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-evtr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.