CGCB vs SPAB: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 CGCB's duration was 6.3 years and SPAB's 5.9; SPAB charges 0.03% to CGCB's 0.27%. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $6.5bn for Capital Group Core Bond ETF and $9.9bn for State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF.
SPAB costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; SPAB is 1.5 times larger.
| CGCB | SPAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.27% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $6.5bn | $9.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ? |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.9%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGCB and SPAB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
CGCB and SPAB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGCB in plain words
CGCB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SPAB in plain words
SPAB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ?. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCB or SPAB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCB returned −1.7% and SPAB −1.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCB or SPAB?
- SPAB is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCB against SPAB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-spab
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGCB against SPAB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-spab
[CGCB against SPAB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-spab)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.