CGCB vs SCHZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 CGCB's duration was 6.3 years and SCHZ's 5.8; SCHZ charges 0.03% to CGCB's 0.27%. Net assets: $6.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group Core Bond ETF, and $10.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF.
SCHZ costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; SCHZ is 1.9 times larger.
| CGCB | SCHZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.27% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $5.6bn | $10.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.5% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 5.0%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGCB and SCHZ hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
CGCB and SCHZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGCB in plain words
CGCB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
SCHZ in plain words
SCHZ tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGCB or SCHZ?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCB returned −1.7% and SCHZ −1.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGCB or SCHZ?
- SCHZ is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGCB against SCHZ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-schz
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CGCB against SCHZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-schz
[CGCB against SCHZ (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcb-vs-schz)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.