Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to USFR's +4.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and USFR
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
Pair scorecard
USFR costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points.
| Measure | CGBL | USFR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +4.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, CGBL as of Oct 27, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026 | $7.9bn | $17.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
USFR
USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or USFR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and USFR +4.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or USFR?
- USFR is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against USFR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-usfr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against USFR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-usfr
[CGBL against USFR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-usfr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.