Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGBL vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGBL returned +7.1% to SCHG's +6.8%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGBL and SCHG
Net assets: $7.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Balanced ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points.
| Measure | CGBL | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, CGBL as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $7.9bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 59.3% | 51.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 159 weekly returnsSCHG returned more: +89.7% to +55.6%. CGBL swung less: 10.4% to 18.9%. CGBL fell less at its worst: −10.0% to −21.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CGBL | SCHG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +55.6% | +89.7% | SCHG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.6% | +23.3% | SCHG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +46.8% | +87.2% | SCHG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 10.4% | 18.9% | CGBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 6.7% | 11.9% | CGBL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −10.0% | −21.9% | CGBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.02 | 0.97 | CGBL (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.58 | 1.53 | CGBL (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.55 | 1.06 | CGBL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and SCHG hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGBL and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. CGBL follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- Cost. CGBL charges 0.33% of assets a year and SCHG 0.04%, a gap of 0.29 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +7.5% for its benchmark, the 60%/40% S&P 500 Index/Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
CGBL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +7.1% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGBL against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGBL against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-schg
[CGBL against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.