Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PDBC vs SCHG: how they differ
PDBC and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PDBC | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 75.58% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 24.42% | Apple Inc 9.84% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.18% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.68% | |
| Alphabet Inc 4.76% | |
| Broadcom Inc 4.55% | |
| Tesla Inc 3.92% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | Schwab |
| What it is | Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +55.2% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +37.7 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 2 | 193 |
PDBC in plain words
PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.2% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or SCHG?
- PDBC charges 0.59% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do PDBC and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of PDBC and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PDBC against SCHG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-schg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources