Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PDBC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PDBC and SCHG
Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHG costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 48.8 points.
| Measure | PDBC | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +55.6% | +6.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 | $8.0bn | $63.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PDBC and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and SCHG +6.8%.
- Which is cheaper, PDBC or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PDBC against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PDBC against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-schg
[PDBC against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.