Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CATH vs CGGR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CATH returned +10.9% to CGGR's +2.6%; 40% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CATH and CGGR
Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF, and $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
CATH costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; CGGR is 19.1 times larger.
| Measure | CATH | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.9% | +2.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $1.4bn | $26.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 40% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.2% | 39.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CATH and CGGR hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
40% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CATH and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CATH and CGGR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CATH follows S&P 500 Catholic Values Index and CGGR follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 40% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CATH returned +10.9% and CGGR +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CATH
CATH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 445 positions, with the top ten at 39.2%.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CATH or CGGR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CATH returned +10.9% and CGGR +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CATH or CGGR?
- CATH is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CATH against CGGR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-cggr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CATH against CGGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-cggr
[CATH against CGGR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cath-vs-cggr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.