Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SCHH?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SCHH +8.7%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or SCHH?

SCHH is cheaper, by 4.61 percentage points a year. That is about $461 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs SCHH: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and SCHH an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +8.7%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and SCHH

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $11.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.

BWET on its own →SCHH on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+8.7%

SCHH total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.07%

SCHH expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHH costs 4.61 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5113.0 points.

BWET vs SCHH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	SCHH
Return
Measure	BWET	SCHH
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+8.7%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	SCHH
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026	8.5%, high on Jul 24, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	SCHH
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	US REIT
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	SCHH
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.07%
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHH as of Aug 31, 2026	$178m	$11.2bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	SCHH
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		74%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		51.6%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Breakwave Schwab

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks an index of US REIT

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +8.7%

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.07%

Holdings not counted 117

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and SCHH as of Aug 31, 2026 $178m $11.2bn

BWET and SCHH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHH

SCHH tracks an index of US REIT. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%. It sat 8.5% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SCHH?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and SCHH +8.7%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or SCHH?: SCHH is cheaper, by 4.61 percentage points a year. That is about $461 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs IYR BWET vs VNQ BWET vs XLRE BWET vs XLP SCHH vs USO SCHH vs SIVR SCHH vs SLV GLDM vs SCHH

Where to next

BWET on its own →SCHH on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →SCHH dividend history →SCHH holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

SCHH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SCHH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Schwab website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against SCHH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-schh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.