Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BWET vs FLKR: Differences, Returns & Fees
BWET is a commodity futures fund and FLKR an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +79.7%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BWET and FLKR
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $178m for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and $1.9bn for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
Pair scorecard
FLKR costs 4.59 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5042.0 points; FLKR is 10.7 times larger.
| Measure | BWET | FLKR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5,121.7% | +79.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026 | 24.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Tanker freight futures | FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 4.68% | 0.09% |
| Net assets | $178m | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Holdings dated | Jun 30, 2026 | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Risk and return
May 12, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 180 weekly returnsBWET returned more: +5,753.7% to +176.6%. FLKR swung less: 34.0% to 87.4%. FLKR fell less at its worst: −30.0% to −55.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BWET | FLKR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +5,753.7% | +176.6% | BWET | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +224.0% | +34.2% | BWET | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +5,753.7% | +144.0% | BWET | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 87.4% | 34.0% | FLKR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 40.2% | 22.6% | FLKR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −55.9% | −30.0% | FLKR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.71 | 0.90 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 3.72 | 1.36 | BWET | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 4.01 | 1.14 | BWET | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 180 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BWET and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for BWET.
Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.
BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FLKR
FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +79.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 156 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 24.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or FLKR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and FLKR +79.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BWET or FLKR?
- FLKR is cheaper, by 4.59 percentage points a year. That is about $459 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BWET against FLKR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-flkr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BWET against FLKR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-flkr
[BWET against FLKR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-flkr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.