Which returned more over the last year, BWET or EWY?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and EWY returned +147.9%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BWET or EWY?

BWET charges 0.15% a year and EWY charges 0.59%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs EWY: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and EWY an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +147.9%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

BWET and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	iShares
What it is	Tanker Shipping	MSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+147.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+130.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.59%
Holdings	not filed	80

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 61.9%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or EWY?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and EWY returned +147.9%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BWET or EWY?: BWET charges 0.15% a year and EWY charges 0.59%, so BWET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against EWY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against EWY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-ewy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources