IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BWET vs DYNF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and DYNF an actively managed equity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +14.5%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and DYNF

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $42.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF.

BWET on its own →DYNF on its own →
At a glance
+5,121.7%
BWET total return, 1 year
+14.5%
DYNF total return, 1 year
4.68%
BWET expense ratio
0.26%
DYNF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

DYNF costs 4.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5107.2 points; DYNF is far larger, $42.4bn against $186m.

BWET vs DYNF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBWETDYNF
Return
Total return, 1 year+5,121.7%+14.5%
Drawdown
Below its high11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksTanker freight futuresNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio4.68%0.26%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$186m$42.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund40.7%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Breakwave iShares
What it is Holds tanker freight futures Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +14.5%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.3% (PBUS)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +1.2 pts vs PBUS
Expense ratio 4.68% 0.26%
Holdings not counted 262
Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and DYNF as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $42.7bn

BWET and DYNF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

BWET and DYNF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

DYNF

DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or DYNF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and DYNF +14.5%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or DYNF?
DYNF is cheaper, by 4.42 percentage points a year. That is about $442 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
BWET vs SPYBWET vs IVVBWET vs VOOBWET vs SCHBDYNF vs USODYNF vs SIVRDYNF vs SLVDYNF vs GLDM
Where to next
BWET on its own →DYNF on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →DYNF dividend history →DYNF holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
Breakwave page for BWET ↗
DYNF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
DYNF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
iShares page for DYNF ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against DYNF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-dynf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.