Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IVV?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IVV +13.7%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or IVV?

IVV is cheaper, by 4.65 percentage points a year. That is about $465 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and IVV an equity index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +13.7%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and IVV

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $885.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

BWET on its own →IVV on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+13.7%

IVV total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.03%

IVV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IVV costs 4.65 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5108.0 points; IVV is far larger, $880.6bn against $186m.

BWET vs IVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	IVV
Return
Measure	BWET	IVV
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+13.7%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	IVV
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	IVV
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	S&P 500
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	IVV
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.03%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026	$186m	$880.6bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	IVV
Holdings in common	not published
In the S&P 500, by weight		100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund		38.1%

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF

Issuer Breakwave iShares

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks the S&P 500

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +13.7%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (SPY)

Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.1 pts vs SPY

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.03%

Holdings not counted 505

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and IVV as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $885.1bn

BWET and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IVV

IVV tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or IVV?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and IVV +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or IVV?: IVV is cheaper, by 4.65 percentage points a year. That is about $465 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs SPY BWET vs VOO BWET vs VTI BWET vs ITOT IVV vs USO IVV vs SIVR IVV vs SLV GLDM vs IVV

Where to next

BWET on its own →IVV on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →IVV dividend history →IVV holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

IVV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IVV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IVV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against IVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-ivv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.