Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BTAL vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BTAL returned −11.5% to GLD's +2.8%, and GLD charges 0.40% to BTAL's 1.25%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BTAL and GLD

Net assets: $283m on Jun 30, 2026 for AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund, and $131.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for SPDR Gold Shares.

At a glance
−11.5%
BTAL total return, 1 year
+2.8%
GLD total return, 1 year
1.25%
BTAL expense ratio
0.40%
GLD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

GLD costs 0.85 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.3 points.

BTAL vs GLD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBTALGLD
Return
Total return, 1 year−11.5%+2.8%
Total return, 52 weeks−10.0%
Drawdown
Below its high24.9%, high on Jan 29, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedGold
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash13.7 points behind
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.25%0.40%
Net assets, BTAL as of Jun 30, 2026 and GLD as of Nov 3, 2026$283m$131.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns−0.74
Beta to the S&P 500−1.37: about 1.37% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellrose 1.80%
Down-week capture−168.4%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund GLD SPDR Gold Shares
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Commodity ETF
Issuer AGF Investments State Street
What it is Market neutral Holds gold
Total return, 1 year −11.5% +2.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) +2.9% (IAU)
Gap to its benchmark −26.3 pts vs VOO −0.1 pts vs IAU
Expense ratio 1.25% 0.40%
Net assets, BTAL as of Jun 30, 2026 and GLD as of Nov 3, 2026 $283m $131.3bn

BTAL and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

GLD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BTAL

BTAL is a market neutral fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.74 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −1.37, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.37% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks BTAL rose 1.80% on average, a down-week capture of −168.4%. Over the same 52 weeks BTAL returned −10.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 13.7 percentage points behind cash.

GLD

Its expense ratio is 0.40% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.

GLD holds gold. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +2.9% for its benchmark, the price of gold. It sat 24.9% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are BTAL and GLD in the same category?
BTAL is an alternatives ETF and GLD is a commodity ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BTAL or GLD?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BTAL returned −11.5% and GLD +2.8%.
Which is cheaper, BTAL or GLD?
GLD is cheaper, by 0.85 percentage points a year. That is about $85 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BTAL against GLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/btal-vs-gld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.