Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BSCS vs IBDU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

BSCS's duration was 1.8 years on May 31, 2026 and IBDU's 2.6 on Jul 31, 2026; both charge 0.10%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BSCS and IBDU

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.5bn for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF and $4.0bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF.

At a glance
+2.4%
BSCS total return, 1 year
+1.3%
IBDU total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCS expense ratio
0.10%
IBDU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.10% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; IBDU is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BSCS vs IBDU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCSIBDU
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.4%+1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksInvesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 IndexBloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.5bn$4.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 27, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026 · 369 weekly returns
BSCS IBDU
Return
Total return edge BSCS (slight) +17.7% +16.3%
Annualized edge BSCS (slight) +2.3% +2.1%
Price return edge BSCS −8.0% −10.3%
Risk
Volatility edge BSCS (slight) 8.1% 8.3%
Max drawdown edge BSCS (slight) −18.3% −18.9%
Downside capture 82.2% 100.2%
Beta 1.03 1.21
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BSCS −0.03 −0.05
Sortino edge BSCS −0.04 −0.06
Treynor 0.010 −0.003
Calmar edge BSCS 0.13 0.11
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.1% a year +1.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.18 1.21
Information ratio 0.40 0.34
Tracking error 5.0% 3.9%

Each against its own benchmark: BSCS against AGG, Aug 17, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026; IBDU against IUSB, Sep 27, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

BSCS returned slightly more: +17.7% to +16.3%. BSCS swung slightly less: 8.1% to 8.3%. BSCS fell slightly less at its worst: −18.3% to −18.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BSCS vs IBDU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCSIBDUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+17.7%+16.3%BSCS (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.3%+2.1%BSCS (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return−8.0%−10.3%BSCSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.1%8.3%BSCS (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.2%6.4%BSCS (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.3%−18.9%BSCS (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.0%109.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture82.2%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.031.21Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.580.80Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.03−0.05BSCSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.04−0.06BSCSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.010−0.003Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.130.11BSCSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGIUSBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.1% a year+1.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.181.21Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.4% to +5.5%−1.1% to +4.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.400.34Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.0%3.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 369 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BSCS and IBDU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BSCS IBDU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BSCS
CVS Health Corp., due Mar 25, 2028 1.18%
Cigna Group (The), due Oct 15, 2028 0.90%
Amgen Inc., due Mar 2, 2028 0.89%
AerCap Ireland Capital DAC / AerCap Global Aviation Trust, due Oct 29, 2028 0.86%
Salesforce, Inc., due Mar 15, 2028 0.83%
RTX Corp., due Nov 16, 2028 0.71%
Sprint Capital Corp., due Nov 15, 2028 0.62%
Citibank N.A., due Sep 29, 2028 0.61%
Only in IBDU
AbbVie Inc, due Nov 21, 2029 0.97%
Salesforce Inc, due Mar 15, 2029 0.73%
Verizon Communications Inc, due Dec 3, 2029 0.63%
International Business Machines Corp, due May 15, 2029 0.61%
Oracle Corp, due Feb 4, 2029 0.58%
AT&T Inc, due Mar 1, 2029 0.58%
Amazon.com Inc, due Mar 13, 2029 0.58%
Fiserv Inc, due Jul 1, 2029 0.57%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +2.4% +1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs AGG +2.5 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.10%
Holdings 487 729
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.5bn $4.0bn

BSCS and IBDU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4C3A63F49C

BSCS and IBDU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCS follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 Index and IBDU follows Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BSCS returned +2.4% and IBDU +1.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

BSCS and IBDU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BSCS

BSCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

IBDU

IBDU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCS or IBDU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCS returned +2.4% and IBDU +1.3%.
Which is cheaper, BSCS or IBDU?
Neither: BSCS and IBDU both charge 0.10% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCS against IBDU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscs-vs-ibdu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.