Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BSCS vs BSCU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

On May 31, 2026 BSCS's duration was 1.8 years and BSCU's 3.6; both charge 0.10%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BSCS and BSCU

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.5bn for Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF and $2.8bn for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+2.4%
BSCS total return, 1 year
+0.3%
BSCU total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCS expense ratio
0.10%
BSCU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.10% a year; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; BSCS is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BSCS vs BSCU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCSBSCU
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.4%+0.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksInvesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 IndexInvesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$3.5bn$2.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 25, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 317 weekly returns · each against AGG
BSCS BSCU
Return
Total return edge BSCS +9.1% +3.1%
Annualized edge BSCS +1.4% +0.5%
Price return edge BSCS −12.5% −17.7%
Risk
Volatility edge BSCS 4.4% 6.1%
Max drawdown edge BSCS −16.7% −22.0%
Downside capture 67.4% 99.8%
Beta 0.73 1.06
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BSCS (slight) −0.39 −0.42
Sortino edge BSCS (slight) −0.53 −0.57
Treynor −0.024 −0.024
Calmar edge BSCS 0.09 0.02
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.8% a year +1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.04 1.33
Information ratio 0.72 0.44
Tracking error 2.4% 2.1%
Reading

BSCS returned more: +9.1% to +3.1%. BSCS swung less: 4.4% to 6.1%. BSCS fell less at its worst: −16.7% to −22.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BSCS vs BSCU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBSCSBSCUAGGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+9.1%+3.1%BSCSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.4%+0.5%BSCSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.5%−17.7%BSCSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.4%6.1%BSCSSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.3%4.5%BSCSLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−16.7%−22.0%BSCSDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture72.4%106.7%100.0%BSCUShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture67.4%99.8%100.0%BSCSShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.731.061.00BSCS lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.810.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.39−0.42BSCS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.53−0.57BSCS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.024−0.024−0.035BSCS (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.090.02BSCSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGAGGAGGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.8% a year+1.1% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.041.33Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +2.4%−0.5% to +2.8%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.720.44BSCSReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.4%2.1%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 317 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BSCS and BSCU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BSCS BSCU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BSCS
CVS Health Corp., due Mar 25, 2028 1.18%
Cigna Group (The), due Oct 15, 2028 0.90%
Amgen Inc., due Mar 2, 2028 0.89%
AerCap Ireland Capital DAC / AerCap Global Aviation Trust, due Oct 29, 2028 0.86%
Salesforce, Inc., due Mar 15, 2028 0.83%
RTX Corp., due Nov 16, 2028 0.71%
Sprint Capital Corp., due Nov 15, 2028 0.62%
Citibank N.A., due Sep 29, 2028 0.61%
Only in BSCU
Boeing Co. (The), due May 1, 2030 1.22%
Meta Platforms, Inc., due Nov 15, 2030 1.05%
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., due Jul 1, 2030 0.82%
Oracle Corp., due Sep 26, 2030 0.78%
Amgen Inc., due Mar 2, 2030 0.75%
Citibank N.A., due May 29, 2030 0.68%
Alphabet Inc., due Nov 15, 2030 0.66%
Amazon.com, Inc., due Nov 20, 2030 0.66%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BSCS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +2.4% +0.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs AGG +1.7 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.10%
Holdings 487 450
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $3.5bn $2.8bn

BSCS and BSCU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-95D62904DE

BSCS and BSCU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCS follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2028 Index and BSCU follows Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BSCS returned +2.4% and BSCU +0.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

BSCS and BSCU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BSCS

BSCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

BSCU

BSCU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCS or BSCU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCS returned +2.4% and BSCU +0.3%.
Which is cheaper, BSCS or BSCU?
Neither: BSCS and BSCU both charge 0.10% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCS against BSCU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscs-vs-bscu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.