Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IBDU vs IBDW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

On Jul 31, 2026 IBDU's duration was 2.6 years and IBDW's 4.2; both charge 0.10%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IBDU and IBDW

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $4.0bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF and $2.7bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF.

At a glance
+1.3%
IBDU total return, 1 year
−0.6%
IBDW total return, 1 year
0.10%
IBDU expense ratio
0.10%
IBDW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.10% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.9 points; IBDU is 1.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IBDU vs IBDW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIBDUIBDW
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.3%−0.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate IndexBloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.10%0.10%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$4.0bn$2.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 277 weekly returns · each against IUSB
IBDU IBDW
Return
Total return edge IBDU +5.4% +0.5%
Annualized edge IBDU +1.0% +0.1%
Price return edge IBDU −15.0% −19.8%
Risk
Volatility edge IBDU 5.3% 6.9%
Max drawdown edge IBDU −18.8% −23.3%
Downside capture 86.8% 114.3%
Beta 0.92 1.21
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie −0.48 −0.49
Sortino edge Tie −0.65 −0.65
Treynor −0.028 −0.028
Calmar edge IBDU 0.05 0.00
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.7% a year +0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.88 1.14
Information ratio 0.53 0.06
Tracking error 1.8% 2.1%
Reading

IBDU returned more: +5.4% to +0.5%. IBDU swung less: 5.3% to 6.9%. IBDU fell less at its worst: −18.8% to −23.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IBDU vs IBDW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIBDUIBDWIUSBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+5.4%+0.5%IBDUPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+1.0%+0.1%IBDUTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−15.0%−19.8%IBDUPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.3%6.9%IBDUSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.9%5.2%IBDULike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.8%−23.3%IBDUDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture89.5%120.9%100.0%IBDWShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture86.8%114.3%100.0%IBDUShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.921.211.00IBDU lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.931.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.48−0.49TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.65−0.65TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor−0.028−0.028−0.035TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.050.00IBDUAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIUSBIUSBIUSBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.7% a year+0.9% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.881.14Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.8% to +2.1%−0.6% to +2.4%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.530.06IBDUReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.8%2.1%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 277 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IBDU and IBDW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IBDU IBDW
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IBDU
AbbVie Inc, due Nov 21, 2029 0.97%
Salesforce Inc, due Mar 15, 2029 0.73%
Verizon Communications Inc, due Dec 3, 2029 0.63%
International Business Machines Corp, due May 15, 2029 0.61%
Oracle Corp, due Feb 4, 2029 0.58%
AT&T Inc, due Mar 1, 2029 0.58%
Amazon.com Inc, due Mar 13, 2029 0.58%
Fiserv Inc, due Jul 1, 2029 0.57%
Only in IBDW
Space Exploration Technologies Corp, due Jul 15, 2031 1.00%
NVIDIA Corp, due Jun 15, 2031 0.97%
Amazon.com Inc, due Mar 13, 2031 0.79%
Salesforce Inc, due Sep 15, 2031 0.75%
Oracle Corp, due Feb 4, 2031 0.72%
Verizon Communications Inc, due Mar 21, 2031 0.71%
Amazon.com Inc, due Jul 9, 2031 0.70%
Meta Platforms Inc, due May 15, 2031 0.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +1.3% −0.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark +2.5 pts vs IUSB +0.6 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.10%
Holdings 729 669
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.0bn $2.7bn

IBDU and IBDW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2B6E2DB15F

IBDU and IBDW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IBDU follows Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index and IBDW follows Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IBDU returned +1.3% and IBDW −0.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IBDU and IBDW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IBDU

IBDU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

IBDW

IBDW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBDU or IBDW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBDU returned +1.3% and IBDW −0.6%.
Which is cheaper, IBDU or IBDW?
Neither: IBDU and IBDW both charge 0.10% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBDU against IBDW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibdu-vs-ibdw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.