A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

BSCQ vs VRIG: Differences, Returns & Fees

BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and VRIG's 0.3 on Jul 31, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to VRIG's 0.30%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF and $1.9bn for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCQ and VRIG

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BSCQ costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; BSCQ is 1.6 times larger.

BSCQ vs VRIG: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQVRIG
Expense ratio0.10%0.30%
Net assets$3.1bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.8%+4.3%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.8%
BSCQ total return, 1 year
+4.3%
VRIG total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCQ expense ratio
0.30%
VRIG expense ratio

Get BSCQ and VRIG fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-E09B496610

BSCQ and VRIG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ and VRIG follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and VRIG holds 363.
  3. Cost. BSCQ charges 0.10% of assets a year and VRIG 0.30%, a gap of 0.20 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Invesco Invesco
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.8% +4.3%
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.30%
Holdings 64 363
Net assets $3.1bn $1.9bn

BSCQ and VRIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCQ

BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About VRIG

VRIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or VRIG?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and VRIG +4.3%.
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or VRIG?
BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BSCQ vs XHLFBSCQ vs TBUXBSCQ vs IBTGBSCQ vs GSSTIBDR vs VRIGIBTH vs VRIGCLIP vs VRIGFTSM vs VRIG
BSCQ on its own →VRIG on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BSCQ dividend history →BSCQ holdings →VRIG dividend history →VRIG holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BSCQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCQ ↗VRIG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗VRIG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for VRIG ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCQ against VRIG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-vrig

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.