BSCQ vs TFLO: Differences, Returns & Fees

BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and TFLO's 0.0 on Jul 31, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to TFLO's 0.15%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF and $7.2bn for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCQ and TFLO

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BSCQ costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; TFLO is 2.4 times larger.

BSCQ vs TFLO: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQTFLO
Expense ratio0.10%0.15%
Net assets$3.1bn$7.2bn
Total return, 1 year+3.8%+4.0%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQBloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.8%
BSCQ total return, 1 year
+4.0%
TFLO total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCQ expense ratio
0.15%
TFLO expense ratio

Get BSCQ and TFLO fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-F2B62188B8

BSCQ and TFLO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ and TFLO follows Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index.
  2. Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and TFLO holds 8.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and TFLO +4.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.8% +4.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +4.0% (USFR)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs USFR
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.15%
Holdings 64 8
Net assets $3.1bn $7.2bn

BSCQ and TFLO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCQ

BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About TFLO

TFLO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or TFLO?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and TFLO +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or TFLO?
BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCQ against TFLO, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-tflo

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.