Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to XLB's +18.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and XLB

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $8.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+18.5%
XLB total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.08%
XLB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLB costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.9 points.

BOND vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDXLB
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+18.5%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMaterials Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.08%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$8.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND XLB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in XLB
LINDE PLC 12.96%
NEWMONT CORP 6.56%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 5.23%
ECOLAB INC 4.98%
VULCAN MATERIALS CO 4.89%
NUCOR CORP 4.89%
AIR PRODUCTS + CHEMICALS INC 4.84%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC 4.77%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Materials
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +18.5%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.08%
Holdings 1565 25
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLB as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $8.1bn

BOND and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLB

XLB tracks an index of Materials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or XLB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and XLB +18.5%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or XLB?
XLB is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against XLB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-xlb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.