Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to VONG's +1.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and VONG

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $47.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+1.1%
VONG total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.06%
VONG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VONG costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points.

BOND vs VONG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVONG
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+1.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.06%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$47.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and VONG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND VONG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in VONG
NVIDIA Corp 15.63%
Apple Inc 7.65%
Alphabet Inc 5.88%
Microsoft Corp 5.59%
Broadcom Inc 4.79%
Alphabet Inc 4.75%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.83%
Micron Technology Inc 3.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +1.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +0.9% (IWF)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG +0.2 pts vs IWF
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.06%
Holdings 1565 373
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VONG as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $47.1bn

BOND and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VONG

VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or VONG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and VONG +1.1%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or VONG?
VONG is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against VONG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-vong

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.