Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BOND vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to TLT's −7.9%, and TLT charges 0.15% to BOND's 0.54%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BOND and TLTNet assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
TLT costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points.
| Measure | BOND | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 42.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 | $8.3bn | $47.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BOND and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BOND and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOND
BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
TLT
TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOND or TLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and TLT −7.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BOND or TLT?
- TLT is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BOND against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-tlt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BOND against TLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-tlt
[BOND against TLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-tlt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.