Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
TLT vs VUSB: how they differ
TLT and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VUSB returned more over the year.
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TLT and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in TLT | Only in VUSB |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16% | United States Treasury Bill 4.24% |
| TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68% |
| TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03% | PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59% |
| TREASURY BOND 0.02% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53% |
| Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52% | |
| US Bancorp 0.51% | |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50% | |
| Truist Bank 0.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | 20+ year Treasuries | Ultra-Short Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | −6.4% | +3.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −23.9 pts | −13.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.10% |
| Holdings | 41 | 1281 |
TLT in plain words
TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
VUSB in plain words
VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VUSB?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so VUSB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, TLT or VUSB?
- TLT charges 0.15% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLT against VUSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-vusb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources