Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to RDVY's +17.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and RDVY

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $25.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+17.6%
RDVY total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.47%
RDVY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RDVY costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.0 points.

BOND vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDRDVY
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20265.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.47%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and RDVY as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$25.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and RDVY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND RDVY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in RDVY
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.42%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 2.32%
Visa Inc. (Class A) 2.26%
Microsoft Corporation 2.22%
Accenture plc 2.19%
The Allstate Corporation 2.17%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.14%
Expedia Group, Inc. 2.13%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG +3.9 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.47%
Holdings 1565 72
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and RDVY as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $25.4bn

BOND and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

RDVY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RDVY

RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or RDVY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and RDVY +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or RDVY?
RDVY is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against RDVY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-rdvy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.