Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
RDVY vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RDVY returned +17.6% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about RDVY and VGLTNet assets: $25.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGLT costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.3 points.
| Measure | RDVY | VGLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | −6.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 38.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index | Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, RDVY as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $25.4bn | $10.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 94% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
RDVY and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VGLT
VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VGLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +17.6% and VGLT −6.7%.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or VGLT?
- VGLT is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, RDVY against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-vglt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). RDVY against VGLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-vglt
[RDVY against VGLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rdvy-vs-vglt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.