Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BOND vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to IWB's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BOND and IWB
Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.5 points.
| Measure | BOND | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IWB as of Oct 28, 2026 | $8.3bn | $49.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BOND and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BOND and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOND
BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOND or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BOND or IWB?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BOND against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BOND against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-iwb
[BOND against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.