Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BNO vs OILK: Differences, Returns & Fees
BNO is a commodity futures fund and OILK a commodity fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNO returned +141.2% against +91.1%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BNO and OILK
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $924m for United States Brent Oil Fund, LP ETV and $258m for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF.
Pair scorecard
OILK costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 50.1 points; BNO is 3.6 times larger.
| Measure | BNO | OILK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +141.2% | +91.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Energy futures | Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.15% | 0.70% |
| Net assets | $924m | $258m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
Oct 7, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 524 weekly returnsBNO returned more: +372.3% to +66.7%. OILK swung slightly less: 36.3% to 37.6%. BNO fell less at its worst: −72.0% to −82.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BNO | OILK | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +372.3% | +66.7% | BNO | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.7% | +5.2% | BNO | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +372.3% | −42.7% | BNO | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 37.6% | 36.3% | OILK (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 25.0% | 25.8% | BNO (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −72.0% | −82.6% | BNO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.53 | 0.26 | BNO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.80 | 0.36 | BNO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.23 | 0.06 | BNO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 524 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BNO and OILK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BNO and OILK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BNO follows Energy futures and OILK follows Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BNO returned +141.2% and OILK +91.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 50.1 points.
- Cost. BNO charges 1.15% of assets a year and OILK 0.70%, a gap of 0.45 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BNO
BNO holds energy futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +141.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.15% a year.
OILK
OILK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +91.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.70% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BNO or OILK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNO returned +141.2% and OILK +91.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BNO or OILK?
- OILK is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BNO against OILK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bno-vs-oilk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BNO against OILK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bno-vs-oilk
[BNO against OILK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bno-vs-oilk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.