Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BNO vs DBO: Differences, Returns & Fees
BNO and DBO are both commodity futures funds, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BNO returned +141.2% against +113.3%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BNO and DBONet assets: $924m on Oct 28, 2026 for United States Brent Oil Fund, LP ETV, and $286m on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco DB Oil Fund.
Pair scorecard
DBO costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.9 points; BNO is 3.2 times larger.
| Measure | BNO | DBO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +141.2% | +113.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 42.2%, high on Jul 14, 2008 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Energy futures | Energy futures |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.15% | 0.73% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $906m | $286m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Risk and return
Jun 11, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 854 weekly returnsBNO returned more: +177.7% to +28.8%. DBO swung less: 29.5% to 34.2%. DBO fell slightly less at its worst: −83.9% to −85.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BNO | DBO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +177.7% | +28.8% | BNO | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +6.4% | +1.6% | BNO | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +177.7% | +9.3% | BNO | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 34.2% | 29.5% | DBO | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 23.4% | 20.7% | DBO | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −85.7% | −83.9% | DBO (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.31 | 0.15 | BNO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.45 | 0.21 | BNO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.07 | 0.02 | BNO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 854 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
BNO and DBO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BNO and DBO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BNO returned +141.2% and DBO +113.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 27.9 points.
- Cost. BNO charges 1.15% of assets a year and DBO 0.73%, a gap of 0.42 points.
- Size. BNO has $906m in net assets and DBO $286m (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); BNO is 3.2 times larger.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BNO
BNO holds energy futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +141.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.15% a year.
Its expense ratio is 0.73% a year, for the three months to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-Q states.
DBO holds energy futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +113.3% with distributions reinvested. It sat 42.2% below its high of Jul 14, 2008 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BNO or DBO?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNO returned +141.2% and DBO +113.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BNO or DBO?
- DBO is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BNO against DBO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bno-vs-dbo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BNO against DBO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bno-vs-dbo
[BNO against DBO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bno-vs-dbo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.