BND vs JBND: Differences, Returns & Fees
BND's duration was 5.7 years on Jun 30, 2026 and JBND's 6.2 on May 31, 2026; BND charges 0.03% to JBND's 0.25%. Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Bond ETF.
BND costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points.
| BND | JBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and JBND as of Oct 9, 2026 | $161.4bn | $8.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | −1.1% |
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 6, 2020 | 4.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BND and JBND hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
10% in common
On the same fields
BND and JBND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND in plain words
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
JBND in plain words
JBND is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 4.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or JBND?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.5% and JBND −1.1%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or JBND?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against JBND, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-jbnd
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BND against JBND. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-jbnd
[BND against JBND (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-jbnd)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.