Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs FMF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BND returned +0.2% to FMF's +11.1%, and BND charges 0.03% to FMF's 0.98%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and FMF

Net assets: $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $298m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund.

At a glance
+0.2%
BND total return, 1 year
+11.1%
FMF total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.98%
FMF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.95 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.9 points.

BND vs FMF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDFMF
Return
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+11.1%
Total return, 52 weeks+10.6%
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash6.9 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.98%
Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and FMF as of Nov 3, 2026$167.4bn$298m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.16
Beta to the S&P 500+0.11: about 0.11% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.11%
Down-week capture9.9%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF FMF First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Managed futures
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +11.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +0.2% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.98%
Holdings 16300 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and FMF as of Nov 3, 2026 $167.4bn $298m

BND and FMF on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

FMF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

FMF

FMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.16 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.11, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.11% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks FMF fell 0.11% on average, a down-week capture of 9.9%. Over the same 52 weeks FMF returned +10.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are BND and FMF in the same category?
BND is a bond ETF and FMF is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, BND or FMF?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +0.2% and FMF +11.1%.
Which is cheaper, BND or FMF?
BND is cheaper, by 0.95 percentage points a year. That is about $95 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against FMF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-fmf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.