Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BND vs MFUT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BND returned +0.2% to MFUT's +22.8%, and BND charges 0.03% to MFUT's 0.89%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BND and MFUT
Net assets: $167.4bn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $39m on Jun 30, 2026 for Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF.
Pair scorecard
BND costs 0.86 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.6 points.
| Measure | BND | MFUT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.2% | +22.8% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +22.8% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | not published |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 19.1 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.89% |
| Net assets, BND as of Oct 31, 2026 and MFUT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $167.4bn | $39m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +0.54 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.74: about 0.74% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.96% | |
| Down-week capture | 89.9% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Side by side
BND and MFUT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +0.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
MFUT
MFUT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.54 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.74, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.74% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks MFUT fell 0.96% on average, a down-week capture of 89.9%. Over the same 52 weeks MFUT returned +22.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 19.1 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Are BND and MFUT in the same category?
- BND is a bond ETF and MFUT is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or MFUT?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +0.2% and MFUT +22.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or MFUT?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.86 percentage points a year. That is about $86 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against MFUT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-mfut
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BND against MFUT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-mfut
[BND against MFUT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-mfut)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.