BND vs CGCB: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jun 30, 2026 BND's duration was 5.7 years and CGCB's 6.3; BND charges 0.03% to CGCB's 0.27%. Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $6.5bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group Core Bond ETF.
BND costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; BND is far larger, $161.4bn against $6.4bn.
| BND | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.27% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $161.4bn | $6.4bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | −1.7% |
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Aug 6, 2020 | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BND and CGCB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
BND and CGCB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND in plain words
BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 4.9% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
CGCB in plain words
CGCB is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or CGCB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.5% and CGCB −1.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BND or CGCB?
- BND is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BND against CGCB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cgcb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BND against CGCB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cgcb
[BND against CGCB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-cgcb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.