Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BITO vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BITO returned −30.5% to PULS's +4.0%, and PULS charges 0.15% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BITO and PULS
Net assets: $1.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares Bitcoin ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.80 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.5 points; PULS is 12.4 times larger.
| Measure | BITO | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | +4.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.6bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BITO and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 151 days apart.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Are BITO and PULS in the same category?
- BITO is a crypto futures ETF and PULS is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −30.5% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BITO against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BITO against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-puls
[BITO against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.