Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BITO vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BITO returned −30.5% to MAGS's +5.8%, and MAGS charges 0.30% to BITO's 0.95%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BITO and MAGS
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $1.6bn for ProShares Bitcoin ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
Pair scorecard
MAGS costs 0.65 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 36.3 points; MAGS is 3.4 times larger.
| Measure | BITO | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −30.5% | +5.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $1.6bn | $5.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BITO and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITO is a registered fund that reaches Bitcoin through what its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 lists: Bitcoin futures and swaps on Bitcoin. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, Bitcoin moved −28.3% and BITO returned −30.5%. That leaves it 2.2 percentage points behind. BITO is a registered investment company: it files a monthly N-PORT rather than a 10-K. Its N-PORT for Aug 31, 2026 puts 67.9% of its net assets in ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF.
A holder gets exposure to Bitcoin without the fund holding the coin itself. That difference is the fee, the cost of rolling the futures from one month to the next, what the futures traded at against Bitcoin, and what the market paid for the shares, all of it together. It is the only number on this page the sponsor does not publish itself.
MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are BITO and MAGS in the same category?
- BITO is a crypto futures ETF and MAGS is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or MAGS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −30.5% and MAGS +5.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or MAGS?
- MAGS is cheaper, by 0.65 percentage points a year. That is about $65 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BITO against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-mags
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BITO against MAGS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-mags
[BITO against MAGS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bito-vs-mags)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.