Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AOR vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AOR returned +7.8% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOR and MAGS

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.9bn for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
AOR total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.15%
AOR expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AOR costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; MAGS is 1.4 times larger.

AOR vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAORMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracks60/40 Balanced AllocationNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.30%
Net assets$3.9bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund99.9%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOR MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AOR
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 35.70%
ISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF 32.15%
ISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF 17.10%
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS 6.34%
iShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET 5.81%
ISHARES CORE S&P MID-CAP ETF 1.89%
ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF 0.92%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Allocation ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +7.8% +5.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.4% (ACWI) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −5.6 pts vs ACWI not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 22.5%
Holdings 7 8
Net assets $3.9bn $5.5bn

AOR and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AOR and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AOR

AOR tracks an index of 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 99.9%.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +7.8% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, AOR or MAGS?
AOR is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOR against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/aor-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.