Which returned more over the last year, BINC or EWT?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and EWT +69.9%.

Which is cheaper, BINC or EWT?

BINC is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do BINC and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of BINC and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BINC vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to EWT's +69.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BINC and EWT

Net assets: $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, and $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

BINC on its own →EWT on its own →

At a glance

+0.5%

BINC total return, 1 year

+69.9%

EWT total return, 1 year

0.40%

BINC expense ratio

0.59%

EWT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BINC costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 69.4 points; BINC is 1.4 times larger.

BINC vs EWT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BINC	EWT
Return
Measure	BINC	EWT
Total return, 1 year	+0.5%	+69.9%
Drawdown
Measure	BINC	EWT
Below its high		7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BINC	EWT
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Measure	BINC	EWT
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$16.8bn	$11.8bn
Holdings
Measure	BINC	EWT
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	24.6%	47.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, BINC and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BINC EWT

TWD/USD 0.00% 0.00%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in BINC

BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.80%

UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 4.50%

TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 4.34%

UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.91%

UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 2.21%

CASH COLLATERAL MORGAN STANLEY & C 1.68%

ISHARES IBOXX $ INV GRADE CORPORAT 0.99%

EUR/USD 0.83%

Only in EWT

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.12%

MEDIATEK 6.03%

HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.31%

DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.25%

ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.86%

NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.54%

UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.04%

ELITE MATERIAL 1.88%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares iShares

What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI Taiwan

Total return, 1 year +0.5% +69.9%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +16.3% (EEM)

Gap to its benchmark not measured +53.6 pts vs EEM

Expense ratio 0.40% 0.59%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 4690 79

Net assets, BINC as of Oct 27, 2026 and EWT as of Oct 28, 2026 $16.8bn $12.0bn

BINC and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BINC

BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

EWT

EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BINC or EWT?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and EWT +69.9%.
Which is cheaper, BINC or EWT?: BINC is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BINC and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of BINC and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

BINC vs FXI BINC vs INDA BINC vs ILF BINC vs FLKR EWT vs IEI EWT vs SCHP EWT vs HYG EWT vs TIP

Where to next

BINC on its own →EWT on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BINC dividend history →BINC holdings →EWT dividend history →EWT holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

BINC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

BINC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for BINC ↗

EWT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

EWT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for EWT ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BINC against EWT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-ewt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.