Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs EWT: how they differ
BINC and EWT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and EWT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BINC | Only in EWT |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 5.13% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.81% | MEDIATEK 7.03% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.14% | DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.10% | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.52% | ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79% |
| iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% | UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09% |
| iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% | ELITE MATERIAL 2.08% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.53% | NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | MSCI Taiwan |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +84.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | +67.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 4124 | 78 |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or EWT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do BINC and EWT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 2% of BINC and 0% of EWT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against EWT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-ewt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources