Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs ILF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BINC returned +0.5% to ILF's +17.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and ILF
Net assets: $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, and $3.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
Pair scorecard
BINC costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.7 points; BINC is 4.8 times larger.
| Measure | BINC | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | +17.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P Latin America 40 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.8bn | $3.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | 55.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or ILF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and ILF +17.2%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or ILF?
- BINC is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against ILF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-ilf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against ILF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-ilf
[BINC against ILF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-ilf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.