Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HYG vs ILF: how they differ
HYG and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HYG and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HYG | Only in ILF |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.68% | NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% |
| 1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56% | VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% |
| MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.47% | ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% |
| PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.35% | PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% |
| WULF COMPUTE LLC 144A 0.29% | GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% |
| GALAXY HELIOS DATA CENTERS II LLC 144A 0.28% | PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% |
| PANTHER ESCROW ISSUER LLC 144A 0.28% | GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% |
| SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.28% | CREDICORP LTD 3.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | US high yield bonds | Latin America 40 |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +33.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.6 pts | +15.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.47% |
| Holdings | 1326 | 47 |
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYG or ILF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HYG or ILF?
- HYG charges 0.49% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ILF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYG against ILF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-ilf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources