Which returned more over the last year, EWT or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWT or SCHP?

EWT charges 0.59% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWT vs SCHP: how they differ

EWT and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWT	Only in SCHP
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 22.07%	United States Treasury 4.09%
MEDIATEK 7.03%	United States Treasury 4.03%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 3.53%	United States Treasury 4.02%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 3.28%	United States Treasury 3.79%
ASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING 2.79%	United States Treasury 3.62%
UNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS CORP 2.09%	United States Treasury 3.42%
ELITE MATERIAL 2.08%	United States Treasury 3.39%
NAN YA PLASTICS CORP 2.04%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EWT and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	MSCI Taiwan	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+84.9%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+67.4 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.03%
Holdings	78	48

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 48.6%.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWT or SCHP?: EWT charges 0.59% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWT against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against SCHP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-schp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources