Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BINC vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 BINC's duration was 2.9 years and EMB's 6.5; EMB charges 0.39% to BINC's 0.40%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BINC and EMBNet assets: $16.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, and $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
EMB costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; BINC is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | BINC | EMB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.8bn | $13.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and EMB hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
2% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BINC and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4,690 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or EMB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +0.5% and EMB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BINC or EMB?
- EMB is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BINC against EMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-emb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BINC against EMB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-emb
[BINC against EMB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-emb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.