BIL vs TBUX: Differences, Returns & Fees

BIL's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and TBUX's 0.7 on May 31, 2026; BIL charges 0.14% to TBUX's 0.17%. Net assets: $51.1bn on Oct 20, 2026 for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BIL and TBUX

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BIL costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; BIL is far larger, $51.2bn against $1.9bn.

BIL vs TBUX: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILTBUX
Expense ratio0.14%0.17%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026$51.2bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+3.9%
What it tracks1-3 month T-billsNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+3.7%
BIL total return, 1 year
+3.9%
TBUX total return, 1 year
0.14%
BIL expense ratio
0.17%
TBUX expense ratio

Get BIL and TBUX fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-439D81141D

BIL and TBUX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BIL follows 1-3 month T-bills and TBUX follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Number of holdings. BIL holds 18 positions and TBUX holds 622.
  3. Size. BIL has $51.2bn in net assets and TBUX $1.9bn (net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026); BIL is 26.9 times larger.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
TBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +3.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +5.8 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.17%
Holdings 18 622
Net assets, BIL as of Oct 20, 2026 and TBUX as of Oct 19, 2026 $51.1bn $1.9bn

BIL and TBUX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BIL

BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About TBUX

TBUX is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or TBUX?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and TBUX +3.9%.
Which is cheaper, BIL or TBUX?
BIL is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BIL against TBUX, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-tbux

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.